Centre International de Recherche

sur l’Environnement et le Développement


Nos tutelles

CNRS Ecole des Ponts CIRAD EHESS AgroParisTech

Nos partenaires

R2DS MPDD FUTURS URBAINS LCS-R Net

Rechercher




Accueil > Rubrique de services > Archive Equipe > Stéphane Hallegatte > Publications

Optimal control models and elicitation of attitudes towards climate damages

Philippe Ambrosi*, Jean-Charles Hourcade, Stéphane Hallegatte, Franck Lecocq, Patrice Dumas, Minh Ha Duong (published in Environmental Modeling and Assessment)

publié le , mis à jour le

Abstract

This paper examines the consequences of various attitudes towards climate damages through a family of stochastic optimal control models (RESPONSE) : cost-efficiency for a given temperature ceiling ; cost-benefit analysis with a "pure preference for current climate regime" and full cost-benefit analysis. The choice of a given proxy of climate change risks is actually more than a technical option. It is essentially motivated by the degree of distrust regarding the legitimacy of an assessment of climate damages and the possibility of providing in due time reliable and non controversial estimates. Our results demonstrate that a) for early decades abatement, the difference between various decision-making frameworks appears to matter less than the difference between stochastic and non stochastic approach given the cascade of uncertainty from emissions to damages ; b) in a stochastic approach, the possibility of non-catastrophic singularities in the damage function is sufficient to significantly increase earlier optimal abatements ; c) a window of opportunity for action exists up to 2040 : abatements further delayed may induce significant regret in case of bad news about climate response or singularities in damages.

Article