Centre International de Recherche

sur l’Environnement et le Développement


Nos tutelles

CNRS Ecole des Ponts CIRAD EHESS AgroParisTech

Nos partenaires

R2DS MPDD FUTURS URBAINS LCS-R Net

Rechercher




Accueil > IMACLIM > IMACLIM Network > IMACLIM Network 2017 annual Workshop

IMACLIM Network 2017 annual Workshop

par Arancha Sánchez - publié le

Workshop overview


The morning of day 1 focused on CIRED presentations about (1) the IMACLIM methodology and the different attached model versions, and (2) an overview of the Network’s extension and some tentative principles that could frame its growing activity. Beyond coming back on the core concepts underpinning IMACLIM models, the methodology presentation allowed situating the country models in the broader context of IMACLIM endeavours : macroeconomic models meant to be coupled to bottom-up models via an iterated exchange on linking variables, to convergence. The second morning session stressed the Network’s extension including the recent prospects to reach to Argentina and Colombia—in addition to Russia. It then moved on to present tentative Network organisation principles, which received broad agreement by Network members. One important addition to the Network discussion was a call for structured methodological material to better explain and promote the IMACLIM approach (by COPPE-UFRJ). Another one was on the Network extending beyond teams implementing IMACLIM models, typically to teams engaged in similar hybrid modelling endeavours and willing to exchange experience on them (by KAPSARC).

The afternoon of day 1 was spent on presentations of the national and international climate policy stakes from country perspectives. Six broad policy issues emerged :

  • 1. The consistency of national and global mitigation commitments and policy action,
  • 2. The political economy of decarbonisation : stranded assets, oil & gas market impacts, etc.
  • 3. Financing decarbonisation : attached investment demand and potential supply sources,
  • 4. Labour market consequences and distributive impacts across household groups,
  • 5. The contribution of non-CO2 gases and the policy action on underlying sectors,
  • 6. The “revenge of geography” or the inadequacy of “point” representations of economies.


At the end of day 1 the roundtable on the consecutive modelling agenda was cancelled to accommodate the accumulated delay. However, the discussions that inspired the above list implicitly produced an overview of current modelling shortcomings—although it must be stressed that some points of the list are already addressed in some IMACLIM versions, at various degrees of refinement.

The morning of day 2 was devoted to an overview of the stages of development of country versions. France and Brazil versions benefit from anteriority of efforts : IMACLIM already exists in different versions for both countries ; includes household groups disaggregation in some of them ; has been applied to several scenario analysis studies ; is the object of continuing methodological developments including via sensitivity analysis on paramount issues as the labour cost/international trade interactions. IMACLIM South Africa has version 1 running and the object of a thorough analysis in the framework of a concluding PhD thesis, including some new developments on the differentiation of labour by skill levels. Saudi Arabia and India have completed the data hybridisation step and are close to complete macroeconomic analysis by 2-sector “KLEM” versions. Last but not least, the effort on China at Tsinghua University is at the last stages of the data treatment effort, which extends to household disaggregation.

The afternoon of day 2 was dedicated to 3 technical sessions of the 4 initially planned -the session on hybridisation was dropped to allow catching up on the agenda. In reshuffled order, the first session focused on code management issues and the possibility to have all country models run one single code posted online on the GitHub software development platform. The second session introduced a multiregional coupling of KLEM country/regional models as an architecture that could be used to bring into consistency national and global scenarios—leaving unanswered the important question of how the global IMACLIM-R (which has India, China and Brazil singularised, as well as the paramount advantage of cutting-edge international fossil markets) could contribute to the architecture. The third and last technical question focused on a Scenario Template that could be systematically used to report the Network’s modelling results, thereby enhancing their control and visibility.


Download the program.